June 14, 2019

Welcome to episode 2 of our bonus collection that includes cannabis professional Curt Robbins. On this episode we begin by exploring the forms of analysis research; take a look at how totally different dosages and cultivars of cannabis can have an effect on us all in numerous methods; contemplate the wonderful methods through which cannabis compounds mimic substances we produce in our personal bodes; and take a look at how we have actually simply scratched the floor when it comes to our information of how our our bodies work together with this plant.

It is episode 2 — we’re simply getting began! Hear, be taught and share!


Kannaboomers: (00:02)

Welcome to Twenty 4:20 the bite-sized instructional podcast from Tom at Kannaboomers and Curt Robbins, creator of greater than 500 articles in regards to the science of hemp and cannabis. We’re giving 20 cannabis subjects 20 minutes every that will help you get smarter about terpenes, cannabinoids, cultivars and far, far more. And our present begins now.

Kannaboomers: (00:29)

Welcome again to Twenty 4:20 the particular bonus collection of podcasts from Kannaboomers and Curt Robbins, who is basically educated about this subject. Our first episode was a primer on the endocannabinoid system. At present we will do a deep dive into how we all know in regards to the efficacy of cannabis. Curt’s going to speak about some foundational research. We have quite a lot of floor to cowl, so let’s soar proper in.

Curt Robbins: (00:52)

And Tom, thanks for having me.

Kannaboomers: (00:55)

You guess. We will discuss extra in regards to the fundamentals and understanding analysis research.

Curt Robbins: (00:58)

You understand, there’s quite a lot of discuss and quite a lot of controversy in regards to the efficacy, the medicinal efficacy of hemp and cannabis and cannabinoids and terpenes that we talked about in episode one. And we talked in regards to the endocannabinoid system, this community of mobile receptors which might be these microscopic receptors on the cell membrane floor they usually’re principally neurotransmitters. And so these molecules from herbs like hemp and cannabis enter our physique by way of ingestion or inhalation they usually plug in and nearly a literal lock-and-key binding mechanism with that receptor community all through the physique. So we’ve all these claims of, of medical efficacy, how, , how will we get to that? How do we all know that, oh, there was a toddler having, , a whole bunch of seizures per week or per 30 days. They uh, eat sure cannabinoids and terpenes and now they’ve two seizures, go from 400 seizures a month, two seizures a month, or presumably no seizure exercise in anyway.

That is stepping into like miracle territory, proper? After which there are understandably individuals who, and I feel this can be a good factor, who’re cynical about that. Good query. It as a result of there are claims of miracles. And we actually, I do know you had Mara Gordon on as, as a visitor a couple of weeks again, and he or she says, look, this isn’t a panacea. This isn’t a miracle. That is chemistry. That is a science. And , we’ve to verify we do not get right into a place the place we’re sort of worshiping on this plant. So how will we get this data and make a conclusion why cannabis reduces seizures, cures most cancers, or perhaps helps scale back tumor measurement? Let’s attempt to watch out with the phrase cures, proper? And we’ve two routes. We have now formal analysis research, and we’ve anecdotal proof. Now, anecdotal proof will be something. It may be an article in a way of life journal for somebody saying, I had most cancers, the medical doctors gave me three months to stay, so there’s nothing we will do. And I began taking this oil, this hemp oil, and it is saved my life. That is not science. That’s an anecdotal report. And that does not imply that there is not any validity to it, however that is not exhausting science.

So let’s take a look at the analysis facet as a result of that is the place we will persuade any cynics of, , the truth of the science. There’s principally two classes in vitro and in vivo. And that is Latin in vitro is principally petri dish experiments. Okay. Laboratory not involving residing creatures and these are the least dependable, however we typically get superb knowledge and a few, , wonderful findings from these research. So we do not wish to low cost them an excessive amount of, however they don’t contain residing creatures. And that is the following degree. These in vivo Research, now there’s totally different ranges of these two. Generally it is a rat research or a mouse or one other animal.

Curt Robbins: (04:02)

They’ve endocannabinoid techniques additionally. Actually, the ECS is in all vertebrates, not simply all mammals. So for this reason we see merchandise geared toward canines and cats, however all vertebrates have an ECS. So there may be quite a lot of validity. Individuals who say, Oh, properly you probably did that research on a rat, not a human. In order that’s true. However once we get right down to the science of it, when a few of these, uh, when the ECS exhibits some very comparable traits in these creatures, we will get some legitimate knowledge that approach. However the gold customary is a human trial. And actually, it is a sure sort. It is a placebo managed double blind human analysis trial.

Kannaboomers: (04:42)

Is that this what’s meant by a medical trial?

Curt Robbins: (04:45)

Sure. They usually’re costly. They’re multi million {dollars}. Sometimes they occur over years. Uh, sometimes federal funds are tied to them. So on the political facet, it is quite a lot of crimson tape and really troublesome, after which you have to use the federal government cannabis and it’s totally low high quality. There’s, there’s all these huge complications that we can’t get into these particulars proper now. However principally we have analysis and we have anecdotal experiences and we have to perceive the variations there. And when it’s analysis, , we see so much on social media, proper? Analysis research says what sort of analysis research, , we have to dig just a bit deeper. And likewise on the human trials, it is a matter of what number of contributors. So the extra contributors, the higher. In principle, you probably have 12 contributors versus 300 contributors, you are going to get some higher, extra detailed knowledge from the 300.

Kannaboomers: (05:39)

Proper. And I do not wish to go deep into this, however pharmaceutical corporations do that routinely, proper? With new merchandise. However for a plant rising in your yard there, there hasn’t been the price range or the need to do that?

Curt Robbins: (05:52)

Proper. Yeah it went underground within the teenagers, the 19 teenagers, not if we did not have to attend till 1937 particular person cities and states started outlawing cannabis. El Paso, Texas was the primary in 1914. So it has been properly over a century the place we’re, we’re making up for misplaced time with this analysis, in case you take a look at totally different techniques inside the physique, okay, proper now we’re contemplating the endocannabinoid system and the molecules that plug into that. However in case you take a look at, uh, different techniques, they have been researched comparatively totally. They had been on the stage that we are actually with the ECS and cannabinoids and terpenes. 100 years in the past, 150 years in the past. Simply sort of studying about these primary mechanisms.

Kannaboomers: (06:38)

We have now much more science, scientific instruments and strategies to uncover what’s actually happening.

Curt Robbins: (06:44)

Yeah. And once more, we get into the political controversies. So anytime there’s federal funding hooked up to that, there’s going to be issues, proper? So once more, you probably have a human medical trial that price $2.6 million and is carried out over 28 months, , there needs to be quite a lot of cooperation to make that challenge occur. And sadly there’s only a ton of roadblocks, which, okay. The excellent news is there may be wonderful analysis happening in Israel and there is terpene analysis in China and the Canadians are doing quite a lot of analysis and on the point of do much more analysis. There’s American corporations who’re saying, Oh yeah, you are going to put roadblocks in our approach. And they also’re doing the analysis in a special, some outdoors the U.S  and a spot like Canada. So within the subsequent few years, , some writers have referred to the interval we’re coming into as a golden age of medical cannabis analysis due to what we’re about to see.

Kannaboomers: (07:38)

That is thrilling. You talked about Israelis and um, , Dr. Raphael Meshulum was a foundational determine in all this doing his work in Israel, proper?

Curt Robbins: (07:47)

Sure. Actually, he was, he and his group had been concerned in one thing we wish to discuss now referred to as the entourage impact. In 1998, Rafael Meshulam and his group revealed a paper and it was referred to as An Entourage Impact and Endogenous Fatty Acid Glycerol Esters, Enhanced Cannabinoid Exercise. This coined the time period entourage impact. Nobody had, , this dialogue didn’t exist prior. Yeah, it was actually superior. Uh, this concept of an entourage impact, and it’s a principle, uh, was superior in 2011 by American Dr. Ethan Russo. He revealed one other analysis paper and these are straightforward to search out on-line and, and folk can do their very own analysis and get into the main points. It was referred to as Taming THC, Potential Hashish Synergy and Phytocannabinoid Terpenoid Entourage Results. And this paper actually took our understanding of a possible entourage impact even additional. So let’s discuss what it’s. It’s the concept we have 113 cannabinoids, 200 terpenes. Now they do not all manifest in a selected cultivar of hemp or cannabis, their potential they’re the genome, they usually can manifest identical to in people, not everyone will get blond hair or blue eyes or lengthy legs or no matter attribute it is perhaps, and that is referred to as a profile, a cannabinoid profile and a terpene profile and a person pattern of hemp or cannabis has these profiles and we will take a look at these profiles. If we analyze a pattern from a laboratory, proper, it is referred to as a Certificates of Evaluation or COA, and that may present us precisely what’s what is going on on in there. Effectively, relying on the precise composition and ratios, that is vital, the ratios of these molecules. Okay. I may need a bunch of THC and a bunch of CBD. What is the ratio? 20 to at least one three to at least one? And we will decide that once we formulate merchandise. So it will get much more difficult.

Kannaboomers: (09:53)

What you are describing seems like two very foundational research in, , on the high you talked about in vitro and in vivo the place these petri dish experiments or how did they start to sort of corral the complexity of all, all these totally different compounds and ratios and all that?

Curt Robbins: (10:09)

A few of the most beneficial research are literally literature evaluations the place they evaluate every part that is been accomplished prior, so they won’t be doing a human trial themselves, however they are often analyzing the info obtained from different human trials. And actually what these research did is that they had been from revered skilled, critical researchers who had been saying for a number of the first occasions in our historical past, hey, this seems to be like we have efficacy right here and this is some numbers to again it up, proper? We all know cannabis and hemp had been used for hundreds of years going again 5, 6,000 in all probability 10,000 years. However we do not have a complete lot of science behind these mechanisms at work and trendy life and folks just like the FDA and cynical customers. We would like science behind it. We wish to know the way it works and why it really works, and the entourage impact helps clarify that. So principally it says that each one of those molecules co-mingling, supply an efficacy that’s larger than the sum of their particular person efficacies. They begin to buffer and enhance and alter the efficacy of one another. And we get new efficacies.

For instance, if we simply have this single molecule referred to as an Isolet, it’d enhance urge for food or lower ache or scale back irritation and swelling or one thing like that. When mixed with a special molecule, the efficacy is perhaps considerably totally different. For instance, the molecule THC will increase urge for food. Okay? It has a molecular cousin, it is barren model referred to as THC V. And THC V reduces urge for food, which might be good for any person with sort two diabetes or weight problems and different circumstances like that. Whereas , they do not wish to do THC as a result of that is their subject. They do not wish to enhance their urge for food.

Kannaboomers: (12:07)

There’s one other wrinkle that I do know you have researched and I’ve heard you talked about earlier than, and that is the, the biphasic response that a few of us have.

Curt Robbins: (12:14)

Uh huh. And that is the place it begins to essentially get a bit difficult, proper? As a result of we like to make blanket statements. We’re a newsfeed society. We would wish to say, , cannabis is nice, cannabis is dangerous. That is sort of ridiculous as a result of once more, we have these a whole bunch of molecules, terpenes and cannabinoids and flavonoids floating round them. They’re so too discuss that set of molecules as only a single factor that is both good or dangerous is a, is sort of ridiculous. However THC is a good instance. The biphasic response for signifies that in low portions, low doses, a molecule has a sure efficacy, however in excessive dose as potent doses, it has a special efficacy and typically that efficacy is polar reverse. And that is what’s a bit horrifying about this as a result of now we will not even say, oh, THC is nice for X, Y, Z, what is the dosage? And we’re not even taking subjective efficacy into consideration pair, proper? So with nervousness particularly, THC reduces the nervousness in low doses, the mellowing impact, proper? Let’s, let’s chill n’ Netflix sort of factor. Proper? In excessive doses, particularly for brand new customers, folks not acclimated. Their endocannabinoid system isn’t acclimated to consuming these molecules and in excessive doses it could actually enhance nervousness, result in disorientation, quote unquote spun out, , as the youngsters say and even blatant panic assaults, , folks present up within the emergency room as a result of they’d two brownies and they need to have had half a brownie or nonetheless it really works.

Kannaboomers: (13:50)

Proper. So it is one other layer of complexity on high of the, the entourage impact. One other side of it too is the concept you can be poor. I imply as we talked about within the first episode, we’ve this endocannabinoid system, we’ve endogenous cannabinoids and phytocannabinoids, however are you able to discuss the opportunity of being poor and the way you may complement your, your physique with phytocannabinoids?

Curt Robbins: (14:16)

Again to Dr. Ethan Russo in 2004 he revealed a analysis paper referred to as Medical Endocannabinoid Deficiency or a CECD: Can This Idea Clarify Therapeutic Advantages of Hashish in Migraine, Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Different Remedy-Resistant Circumstances. I do know it is sort of a verbose title, however correct nonetheless, proper? Yeah. And principally, once more, this can be a principle as as, uh, Mara Gordon identified on one in all your earlier episodes, what Russo noticed was that if have a psychological mannequin of a deficiency within the ECS, why wouldn’t it be poor? Effectively, we do not get sufficient train. We have now poor diets with quite a lot of processed meals. Uh, , we’re all wired about rush hour visitors. Uh, we’d have genetic points, , all of us have imperfections in our code and our physiology, proper? We have now execs, we’ve execs and cons. And uh, so, so we’ve all these potential causes of this deficiency within the ECS.

Effectively, we must always discuss a bit about endocannabinoids versus phytocannabinoids, which I do know we talked a few bit within the first episode, but when the endocannabinoids change into poor, it is like taking vitamin C as a result of your physique isn’t producing. We produce quite a lot of our personal medicines. I do know it is a loopy idea and western medication would not embrace it, proper? So we’ve these endocannabinoids, like anandamide and a couple of AG, and we’re producing our personal medication principally when, when we’ve these, properly if we’ve deficiencies in these ranges, it seems that molecules from crops like hemp are memetic molecules they usually developed after the endocannabinoid system. So the crops are inviting themselves to our occasion, nevertheless it’s our occasion, not their occasion. Hm. Vegetation developed molecules like CBD and THC and limonene and pinene and all of the terpenes and flavonoids after the Mammalian endocannabinoid system. So it is actually cool idea referred to as mimetic molecules. So THC mimics and anandamide and CBD from what we perceive proper now mimics 2 AG and sort of a tough mannequin there, however there’s simply a lot. We do not know. There’s different, , there’s receptor sorts. We have now the CB one and CB two proper now, however there’s receptor sorts which might be each theorized and never even theorized but. We simply do not even know they’re there.

Kannaboomers: (16:45)

That is actually fascinating. I imply, the connection between this plant and anyone with an endocannabinoid system, there’s type of a synergy happening right here, I suppose.

Curt Robbins: (16:55)

Seems this as a very vital system as a result of, properly, everyone knows somebody who’s bought arthritis or fibromyalgia or Crohn’s illness or most cancers or one in all these circumstances that Dr Russo is saying will be prevented if we obtain a state within the endocannabinoid system referred to as homeostasis. And it is only a fancy phrase for steadiness. Okay. However as Mara Gordon identified in an earlier episode, it isn’t a lot that we’re making an attempt to steadiness the ECS. It is we would like a wholesome ECS as a result of it balances all the opposite techniques immune response. How vital is your immune response? I imply, holy cow, proper? So wholesome immune response that ECS is answerable for that. That is what we have discovered during the last couple of a long time.

Kannaboomers: (17:38)

That is some thoughts blowing stuff when you think about how lengthy we have uncared for this plant and the way essential it’s to steadiness.

Curt Robbins: (17:45)

Yeah, I do know we’re all busy and that is one factor we’re making an attempt to do with this collection isn’t discuss for 2 hours. Discuss for 20 minutes. Proper? And let folks be taught as effectively and simply as potential. However the actuality is that is complicated science. You understand, for me the epiphany second was the bi phasic response curve the place I am like, wow, we simply can’t make definitive statements. Particularly once we get thinking about totally different use case eventualities. A six yr previous youngster with Dravet syndrome epilepsy versus an 87 yr previous with osteoporosis. These are very totally different eventualities.
Kannaboomers: (18:18)

And every shopper needs to be concerned themselves. Take a look at and be taught, see what works. There is not any blanket assertion you may make about this plant.

Curt Robbins: (18:26)

Yeah, simply, simply dosing alone is a, I do not wish to name it a sport, however it’s an exercise or train and trial and error, particularly troublesome for, let’s return to the kid sufferers the place they’re rising, proper? Their physiology is altering. Uh, perhaps they’re coming into puberty or , hormonal ranges are altering, however regardless, so dosing is usually a actual headache for fogeys of particular wants. Kids who’re utilizing CBD or cannabis and hemp merchandise, uh, as a result of the kid’s physiology is altering actually on a weekly foundation, uh, they usually need to undergo, the dosing dedication. Once more, it is a, it is a shifting goal.

Kannaboomers: (19:07)

Effectively, it requires quite a lot of consideration and care on, on the facet of anyone who’s utilizing this plant. And that is why we’re doing this collection. And, and uh, hopefully this episode was helpful to individuals who wish to know in regards to the efficacy of the plant and we’ll be persevering with this collection uh, for 18 extra episodes. However that is about it for as we speak. And I wish to thanks, Curt, for taking the time. We look ahead to connecting on the following episode.

Curt Robbins: (19:31)

Thanks Tom, let’s do it once more.

Kannaboomers: (19:33)

You have been listening to Twenty 4:20 a particular version podcast collection from Kannaboomers and Curt Robbins. Need to be taught extra and assist develop the cannabis motion, unfold the phrase and comply with us in your favourite podcast platform at kannaboomers.com.

Reader Interactions

This website makes use of Akismet to scale back spam. Learn the way your remark knowledge is processed.