Assume tank warns Alaska vape tax would safeguard smoking

The influential Heartland Institute has warned Alaska lawmakers that their proposed new sin tax on vapour solutions would harm harm reduction in the state and safeguard cigarette sales. Drawing on a wide variety of scientific proof and help from pro-harm reduction well being organisations, Heartland’s State Government Relations Manager Lindsey Stroud delivered a challenging-hitting rebuttal to claims that vape taxes are in any way valuable.

Alaska’s Residence Bill 94 would slam harm reduction solutions with a punitive 75% wholesale tax. Wholesale taxes are particularly destructive for modest companies the tax has to be paid by the organization when it buys stock, then recouped later from sales – which normally decline, as costs are forced up by the tax. Vape shops, overwhelmingly modest companies, are extremely vulnerable to laws like this.

Heartland point out that although the sponsors of HB 94 are not even attempting to claim their bill would enhance public well being – which it wouldn’t. It is just a income-raising physical exercise. Ironically, as Stroud points out, it would even fail at that. Each and every smoker that switches to vaping implies a substantial saving in healthcare expenses – one particular study located that if all smokers enrolled in Medicaid switched, savings would hit $48 billion per year. On leading of that there’s the financial advantage of thriving modest companies, several of which would be wiped out by the proposed tax. When Pennsylvania brought in a 40% wholesale tax in 2016, 120 vape shops closed inside a year – and teenage smoking prices went up.

Each day vaping “doubles heart attack risk” says flawed study

A new study carried out by the University of California, San Francisco claims to have located proof that men and women who vape ever day are doubling their danger of a heart attack – an even higher raise than from smoking. Nonetheless, there are significant flaws in the study – and the researchers need to have recognized this just before they published, due to the fact they’ve created specifically the very same blunders just before.

If the paper’s claims sound familiar, that is due to the fact they are. UCSF has currently published at least two papers claiming that vaping increases the danger of heart attacks. The issue is that they did a straightforward evaluation amongst vapers, smokers and men and women who do neither, asking if they’d ever had a heart attack. They didn’t ask when they’d had the heart attack.

The clear issue right here is that several smokers switch to vaping due to the fact they had a heart attack. Unless the study asks participants in what order points occurred – which none of the UCSF ones have completed – the information, and any claims drawn from it, are worthless. The study is fatally flawed by the researchers’ failure to acknowledge that correlation does not equal causation.

The senior researcher on all the UCSF papers on this subject was Stanton Glantz, a professor of cardiology who has by no means studied medicine. He’s recognized for his fanatical opposition to tobacco harm reduction and inability to recognize fundamental statistical evaluation.

Aussie university argues for ignorance-primarily based vape bans

A senior academic from South Australia’s Flinders University says state and federal governments should really impose tougher restrictions on vapour solutions due to the fact they “don’t have adequate information”. Ignoring the clear truth that without having information and facts it is not possible to make very good laws, Dr Joshua Newman says a lot more regulations are necessary to safeguard customers.

According to Newman, legislators in Australia – which has some of the world’s harshest anti-vaping laws, like a total ban on nicotine-containing liquids,although vape shops are routinely raided by the police – have completed “almost nothing” to regulate vaping. This suggests that there is certainly a lack of information and facts – and it is in Dr Newman’s head.

Texas anti-harm reduction laws die in committee

Vapers in Texas have been spared a 10% “sin tax” following Residence Bill 4013 was terminally delayed in the state legislature’s committees. Following repeated attempts to amend the bill – by each supporters and opponents of tobacco harm reduction – the THR supporters ultimately won when the bill ran out of time to be presented in this legislative session.

Walmart brings in T21 across all US branches

Retail giant Walmart has announced that it is raising the age limit to obtain tobacco solutions to 21 in all its US retailers – even these in states exactly where it is not essential. In line with prevailing US attitudes the ban will also apply to vapour solutions which include no tobacco, producing it a lot more tricky for young adult smokers to receive the most efficient quit strategy. The organization has also stated it plans to finish sales of sweet-flavoured e-liquids.

(function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0] if (d.getElementById(id)) {return} js = d.createElement(s) js.id = id js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js" fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs) }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'))